الاستجواب في نطاق الدعوى المدنية

دراسة مقارنة

Authors

  • د. أوان عبدالله الفيضي

Abstract

Interrogation is considered as one of the procedures of confirming evidence
that is ordered by the Court itself. This can be in answer of one party request
in a lawsuit concerned by asking the other party various questions… in
order to get the truth, give other evidences towards making the right
decisions toward the case, and enable the Court to reach the truth guided to
this confirming. Thus, the importance of interrogation is represented as a
method to gain the confession of the other party, which is here, as the master
evidence. Although, it is rarely to be confessed by the other party himself,
but mostly by asking and confronting him with the barefaced facts and that
is done in presence of the other party to highlight, directly, the truth. The
confession can be done by interrogating and asking him. So he can not deny
the rights he is interrogated for. This, usually, settled in any session of the
trail concerned. There for right and ambiguity are revealed to accomplish the
justice.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-24

How to Cite

د. أوان عبدالله الفيضي. (2023). الاستجواب في نطاق الدعوى المدنية : دراسة مقارنة. PROSPECTIVE RESEARCHES, (27,28), 153–181. Retrieved from https://pr.hu.edu.iq/index.php/pr/article/view/168