The Influence of Low-Level Radioactivity on Benthic Diatom Communities

Authors

  • Ali B. Azeez Department of Pollution Control, Environmental Research Center, University of Mosul, 41002 Mosul, Nineveh, Iraq. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0923-2508
  • Zahra I. DallalBashi Department of Environmental Systems and Information, Environmental Research Center, University of Mosul, 41002 Mosul, Nineveh, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61704/pr.563

Keywords:

Low-Level Radioactivity, Diatoms, Mineral Springs, Wetlands, Aquatic Ecology

Abstract

Low-level ionising radiation is a persistent environmental factor in many freshwater ecosystems, particularly in mineral springs and areas affected by historical uranium mining. However, its ecological effects under natural field conditions remain poorly quantified. This study investigates the influence of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) and technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (TE-NORM) on benthic diatom communities using field observations from mineral springs and a former uranium mining wetland in Southern Iraq. Diatom assemblages were analysed using morphological and genetic approaches and related to environmental and radiological parameters. Results indicate that radioactivity contributes to the structuring of diatom communities by influencing species dominance and composition, while overall species richness is primarily controlled by physico-chemical conditions. Low-level radioactivity therefore acts as a chronic ecological constraint rather than an acute stressor.

References

Baker, L. A. (2023). Etude de l'impact écologique de faibles bruits de fond radioactifs renforcés naturellement (NORM) ou par une activité humaine (TE-NORM): Les diatomées, modèle pertinent pour explorer l'effet chronique de la radioactivité parmi d'autres facteurs stressants dans les biotopes aquatiques (Doctoral dissertation, Université Clermont Auvergne).

Bradshaw, C. J. A., et al. (2014). Ecological responses to chronic environmental stress. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 523–532.

Brechignac, F., et al. (2016). Wildlife responses to chronic radiation exposure. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 151, 227–237.

Chapin III, F. S., Matson, P. A., & Mooney, H. A. (2002). Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21663-4_6

Galván, I. (2014). Adaptive responses to radiation exposure. Biology Letters, 10, 20131001.

Garzón, L., & Garzón, M. L. (2001). Radioactivity as a significant energy source in prebiotic synthesis. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 31(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006664230212

Henner, P. (2002). Environmental radioactivity. Radioprotection, 37, 1–14.

Lampe, N., et al. (2019). Evolutionary perspectives on background radiation. Evolutionary Applications, 12, 1026–1038.

Mann, D. G., & Vanormelingen, P. (2013). Diatom diversity. Journal of Phycology, 49, 356–372.

Martell, E. A. (1992). Background radiation through geological time. Health Physics, 63, 1–5.

Morgan, W. F., & Bair, W. J. (2013). Issues in low dose radiation biology: the controversy continues. A perspective. Radiation research, 179(5), 501-510. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR3306.1

Møller, A. P., & Mousseau, T. A. (2013). Biological consequences of chronic radiation exposure. Biological Reviews, 88, 226–247.

Smol, J. P., & Stoermer, E. F. (2010). The diatoms: Applications for the environmental and earth sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763175

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

Azeez, A. B., & DallalBashi, Z. I. (2026). The Influence of Low-Level Radioactivity on Benthic Diatom Communities. PROSPECTIVE RESEARCHES, 26(2), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.61704/pr.563

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.