A Critical Discourse Analysis of Lexical Selection in Obama's Speech on Gun Violence Reduction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61704/pr.543

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Gun Violence Reduction, Obama's Speech, Language, Political Discourse

Abstract

Language has a very effective role in the life of the politician as he or she uses it to achieve his or her aims and to convey his or her ideas. This study tries to show particular discursive strategies specially focusing on lexical selection strategies that are followed by Barak Obama in his speech on 16th January, 2013 that can help to draw out his ideology and power. The study follows a critical discourse analysis approach presented by van Dijk (1997) in a way of explicating its validity to explore Obama's ideology and power and trying to present a method for better understanding of political discourse. The study mainly hypothesizes that lexical richness and vocabulary diversity must illuminate hidden ideology and any lexical selection can not be random. The study concludes that Obama's language, particularly lexical selection, is in service of his political interest, social stance and power. It also concludes that Van Dijk's macrostructural analysis is very helpful in studying organized political ideology.

References

Aghagolzadeh, F., & Bahrami-Khorshid, S. (2009). Language as a puppet of politics: A study of McCain’s and Obama’s speech on Iraq war, a CDA approach. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology Theory, 2(1), 218–229.

Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.15

Collet, T., & Najem, T. (2005). Word choices in post 9/11 speeches and the identity construction of the other. https://www.spsa-acsp.ca/papers-2005/najem.pdf

Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.

Holly, W. (1989). Credibility and political language. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Language, power, and ideology: Studies in political discourse (pp. 115–135). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Horváth, J. (2009). A critical discourse analysis of Obama’s political discourse. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Language, Literature, and Culture in a Changing Transatlantic World (pp. 45–56). University of Prešov.

Matić, D. (2012). Ideological discourse structures in political speeches. Komunikaçija Kultura, 3(3), 54–78.

Moosmüller, S. (1989). Phonological variation in parliamentary discussions. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Language, power, and ideology: Studies in political discourse (pp. 165–180). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Sheyegh, K., & Nabifar, N. (2012). Power in political discourse of Barack Obama. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(4), 3481–3491.

van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. Longman.

van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij

Wang, J. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama’s speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.254-261

Wodak, R. (1989). The power of political jargon: A “Club-2” discussion. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Language, power, and ideology: Studies in political discourse (pp. 137–163). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Ali, W. M. (2025). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Lexical Selection in Obama’s Speech on Gun Violence Reduction. PROSPECTIVE RESEARCHES, 25(4), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.61704/pr.543

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.